Economic and social conditions linked to crime
There are clear statistical links between social and economic factors and crime. For example, more crimes are committed in poorer areas, and crime is often higher where inequality between people is great. At the same time, it is important to understand that statistical relationships do not mean that one factor directly causes another. Growing up in poverty therefore does not automatically mean that a person will commit crime; rather, it is about increased risks at the group level.
Family and upbringing
The family is one of the most important environments for children's development, and research shows that upbringing conditions can affect the risk of crime. Children who grow up in unstable family conditions, for example after separations, may face a somewhat higher risk of ending up in criminality. This applies especially when the separation is followed by conflict or when only one parent moves on into a new relationship.
What matters, however, is not the separation itself, but what the situation around the child looks like. Safety, stable relationships, and present adults function as important protective factors.
Research also shows that how young people spend their free time matters greatly. Unstructured leisure time without adult presence, for example just hanging around in groups, increases the risk of crime. In such situations there is less social control and greater opportunity to be influenced by others. At the same time, organized activities such as sports or associations can reduce risk by creating structure, community, and contact with adult role models.
School and belief in the future
School is central to young people's life choices and future opportunities. Research shows that students in schools located in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas commit crime more often than students in more resource-rich schools. An important explanation is the difference in school results and how the future is perceived.
The concept of belief in the future concerns the extent to which an individual believes there are opportunities to succeed in life. Young people who feel that their chances are limited, for example because of poor school results or a lack of opportunities, face a greater risk of turning to criminal environments.
School can therefore function as both a risk factor and a protective factor. When students succeed in school and receive passing grades, their opportunities for further study and work increase, which reduces the risk of crime. A functioning school environment with support from teachers and clear goals can also strengthen students' motivation and belief in the future.
Residential areas and living conditions
The area where a person grows up has great importance for life chances and the risk of crime. In so-called disadvantaged areas, where many people have low income, high unemployment, and weak attachment to the labor market, there is often a concentration of social problems.
The chart shows that the share outside employment remains clearly higher in disadvantaged areas throughout 2010-2018.
- Disadvantaged areas
- Rest of the country
- Other urban areas
Share not employed (%)
Source: SNS, The significance of residential areas for crime and children's opportunities, figure p. 24
Values are reconstructed by close reading of the published figure and may differ marginally from the original dataset.
Show chart data as a table
| Year | Disadvantaged areas | Rest of the country | Other urban areas |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 44 | 28.6 | 26.4 |
| 2011 | 42.4 | 27.8 | 25.8 |
| 2012 | 42.5 | 28.8 | 26.4 |
| 2013 | 42.4 | 28.9 | 26.3 |
| 2014 | 41.6 | 28.7 | 25.9 |
| 2015 | 40 | 28.5 | 25.4 |
| 2016 | 38.6 | 28.3 | 25 |
| 2017 | 37.6 | 27.6 | 24.4 |
| 2018 | 35.3 | 26.9 | 23.9 |
Image source
This situation can be described with the concept of segregation, which means that different groups in society live separated from one another. Segregation leads to people having unequal access to resources such as education, employment, and social networks.
In such environments, marginalization can also arise. This means that individuals or groups end up outside the social community and have limited opportunities to influence their lives. Long-term marginalization can contribute to a feeling of exclusion and reduced trust in society.
Median incomes rise over time in all settings, but the gap between disadvantaged areas and other areas remains substantial.
- Disadvantaged areas
- Rest of the country
- Other urban areas
Median income (SEK thousands)
Source: SNS, The significance of residential areas for crime and children's opportunities, figure p. 26
Values are reconstructed by close reading of the published figure and may differ marginally from the original dataset.
Show chart data as a table
| Year | Disadvantaged areas | Rest of the country | Other urban areas |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 39 | 148 | 180 |
| 2011 | 48 | 162 | 190 |
| 2012 | 45 | 160 | 191 |
| 2013 | 46 | 161 | 197 |
| 2014 | 50 | 168 | 205 |
| 2015 | 58 | 176 | 214 |
| 2016 | 68 | 185 | 226 |
| 2017 | 79 | 195 | 237 |
| 2018 | 95 | 206 | 249 |
Image source
Research shows that children who grow up in these areas, on average, have poorer school results, lower incomes as adults, and a higher risk of committing crime. It is not only about individual factors, but also about the norms, role models, and opportunities that exist in the surrounding environment.
At the same time, it is important to stress that far from everyone who grows up in disadvantaged areas commits crime. Many do well, especially if they have access to protective factors such as functioning schools, safe adults, and positive future opportunities.
References
Sources and links
Books, articles, and source material used in this article.
Book
Granhag, P. A. Stromwall, L. A. Ask, K. & Landstrom, S (2021) Handbook of Forensic Psychology. 2nd ed. Liber
Article
Article
Report